On October 15, under a sky that might have whispered to her inner fashionista, Meghan Markle made a striking return to Nottingham alongside Prince Harry. However, her choice of ensemble—a chocolate-brown turtleneck paired with a burgundy skirt and a slim belt—has ignited a fierce fashion fracas across social media. Perhaps the cosmos flipped a bit during this outing, because while some folks raved about her autumnal vibes reminiscent of her 2017 royal debut, others were quick to zoom in on what they perceived as styling faux pas. Questions arose about the placement of her skirt and the length of her belt, leading to online chatter that hinted at an unexpected wardrobe blunder. Can the planets really influence our fashion choices? Or is it just good ol’ human tendency to scrutinize a royal’s outfit? Whatever the case, the Duchess seems to have unintentionally invited a dialogue about her sartorial decisions, proving that in the realm of celebrity, every detail counts!
Meghan Markle returned to Nottingham with Prince Harry on October 15, but her carefully coordinated outfit has sparked a fresh fashion debate. The Duchess of Sussex stepped out in a chocolate-brown turtleneck, a burgundy skirt, and a slim belt, choosing an understated autumn look for the couple’s latest engagements in Britain. While her outfit drew comparisons to the fashion choices she made during her first official royal engagement in Nottingham in 2017, some social media users were less impressed by the styling. In particular, the placement of Meghan’s skirt and the length of her belt led several critics to question whether she had suffered an unusual wardrobe mishap.

Meghan’s outfit quickly became a talking point on X after photographs from the Nottingham engagement circulated online. One user, @RodgerPug, asked, “Is her skirt on backwards?”
Another commenter, @CatherineHarda3, echoed the question, writing, “Is her skirt on back to front?”
The speculation appeared to center on the skirt’s visible seams and the way the garment sat around her waist. However, there has been no confirmation that Meghan was wearing the skirt incorrectly. The comments reflected viewers’ interpretations of the photographs rather than an established wardrobe mistake. Still, the questions were enough to turn an otherwise understated outfit into another subject of online debate.

The skirt wasn’t the only part of Meghan’s Nottingham look that drew attention. Several commenters also questioned the length of her belt, the fit of her clothing, and the combination of colors.
X user @sueatkilmeedy wrote, “She is a joke. Skirt back to front, belt too long, and gurning.” Meanwhile, @Owen22510126 asked, “Why is she wearing a big (or long) belt??”
Another user, @EnglishMizz, reacted, “Wtaf is that belt doing!!”
The criticism extended beyond the accessories.
“She always looks messy,” @RightMsmagnolia commented. A separate user, @Nancefactor10, complained, “Why does she always wear clothes that do not fit! GET A STYLIST for christ sake.”
Not everyone commenting on the visit focused on Meghan’s appearance, however. Some observers were more interested in seeing Harry and Meghan back together in public, with one supporter, @ZenniJen, writing that Harry looked “genuinely happy again.”

Beyond the online criticism, Meghan’s fashion choices carried a possible connection to an important moment in her royal history. In December 2017, shortly after announcing her engagement to Harry, Meghan accompanied her future husband to Nottingham for their first official public engagement together. That appearance introduced Meghan to the public in a new role, with her wardrobe attracting considerable attention. Nearly nine years later, her return to the same city has renewed interest in the similarities between the two outings.
One notable connection is the British fashion label Joseph, which Meghan wore during her 2017 Nottingham appearance and reportedly incorporated into her latest look. The repeated designer choice has fueled discussion about whether Meghan was intentionally referencing her early days alongside Harry. However, the Duchess has not publicly explained whether the resemblance was deliberate.

Former royal butler Grant Harrold previously offered his interpretation of Meghan’s fashion choices during her return to Britain. Speaking to Marie Claire, Harrold said, “No royal fashion decisions are ever an accident.”
He suggested that Meghan’s choice of British designers, particularly her return to a label associated with her first Nottingham engagement, could be interpreted as a symbolic gesture. The former palace employee also suggested the wardrobe choices marked a new chapter for the Duchess. His comments offered a different perspective from the online criticism, suggesting that the outfit might have been intended to communicate something beyond its appearance. Nevertheless, Harrold’s assessment remains an interpretation, not confirmation, of Meghan’s intentions.

Meghan’s fashion controversy comes amid renewed attention surrounding her and Harry’s return to public engagements in Britain. The couple’s Nottingham appearance already drew headlines for their royal-style return and the reaction it received. Their visit also reportedly caused frustration within palace circles, with questions raised about how their public engagements might affect the royal family’s position.
Despite the criticism, the Sussexes met with community members and supported charitable initiatives during their Nottingham visit. For Meghan, the occasion also marked a return to a city closely associated with the beginning of her public royal journey. Whether her outfit was a deliberate nod to 2017 remains unclear, but the latest debate shows her wardrobe still attracts almost as much attention as her public appearances.
Auto Amazon Links: No products found.