In a turn of events that would make Mercury retrograde cringe, Megyn Kelly is wading into the murky waters of a controversial sexual assault case linked to Cornell University. Her latest audacious suggestion? Rename the notorious group of accused fraternity brothers from the “Cornell 7” to the “Cornell 8”—because, as she argues, the young woman at the center of this storm has also been accused of misconduct. Can you believe it? This makes one wonder if Kelly is channeling her inner astrologer, but instead of predicting the future, she’s mixing up the present into a cosmic mess! Her remarks have ignited a social media firestorm, with backlash so fierce it’s as if Jupiter just threw a tantrum. Grab your popcorn, folks, because this saga is anything but straightforward and promises to keep us on the edge of our seats!
For a deeper dive into this unfolding drama, you can LEARN MORE.
Megyn Kelly is trying to change the infamous name used for the men accused of sexually assaulting a former Cornell University student.
The journalist is now suggesting that the group should be called the “Cornell 8” because the young woman involved has also been accused of sexual misconduct by one of the fraternity brothers.
Megyn Kelly, who is facing heavy backlash, made the remark while discussing Matthew Ingalls, one of the “Cornell 7,” accused in a lawsuit stemming from an October 2024 encounter at his now-defunct fraternity.

During her October 8 broadcast, Kelly said she was no longer comfortable referring to the defendants as the “Cornell 7” without including Jane Doe in the discussion.
“Cornell Eight — that’s what I’m calling them. It’s seven guys, and she’s now an accused assaulter,” Kelly said about the moniker used to describe the seven men named in the lawsuit.
She continued by claiming that Doe may have molested one of the men while he was “physically incapacitated, physically helpless.”
Kelly also argued that such conduct would constitute a crime under New York law, contrasting Ingalls’ allegation with Doe’s original claims.
Her many remarks about the case have since gone viral, sparking outrage online. One critic slammed Megyn as “a horrible human being.”
“Kelly is a hateful person. She’s also ignorant,” another person said, while a third noted, “She’s a very sick twat! My gawd these MAGA twats have zero compassion.”
One more critic wrote, “She is so pathetically desperate for attention since she lost her relevance. The s–t people will say for clicks and likes. What a world we have created.”

Ingalls’s counteraccusation has become a central part of the latest public debate surrounding the case.
As reported by The Blast, Ingalls told Cornell investigators that he was incapacitated by alcohol and ketamine and alleged that Doe sexually assaulted him. He has described being unable to remain awake during parts of the encounter.
Kelly used that account to argue that the allegations against Doe should be taken seriously alongside the claims she has made against the fraternity members.
The original civil lawsuit, filed by Doe, accuses seven former Cornell students of drugging and sexually assaulting her at the fraternity house in October 2024. She has alleged that she was too intoxicated to consent to the sexual activity that followed.
The defendants have denied wrongdoing, and some have maintained that the encounter was consensual.

Kelly also challenged Doe’s account by referring to what she said were statements made in the room during the encounter.
“What Jane Doe was actually saying in that room, according to those who were there, was, ‘We’re all consenting adults here in medieval times,’” Kelly said, per OK Magazine.
She further alleged that Doe was inviting other men into the room and verbally agreeing to sexual activity involving multiple people.
“This was normal and was opening the door to let more men in, and was actually verbally consenting to threesomes,” Kelly explained.
In another shocking claim by Kelly, she suggested that Doe may have enjoyed the encounter because she felt admired.
During her October 5 show, Kelly said, “No one will even consider the possibility that this woman made a decision to get it on with four men total, not seven, and enjoyed it because — I’m just going to be honest, she’s not the most attractive gal.”
Kelly also criticized Doe’s appearance, saying, “She’s extremely beefy in her arms and her legs. She has a whole video online talking about her cankles,” before suggesting she “possibly enjoyed being admired.”
She speculated that Doe felt “admired, wanted” and “loved by these guys at Cornell,” adding, “She’s probably thrilled to be so admired because she clearly didn’t grow up the incredibly beautiful one.”
Kelly maintained, “I’m not trying to be insulting. I’m just trying to tell you the narrative that is likely to have occurred here, in my opinion.”
Doe’s identity has not been publicly disclosed.
Leaked text messages and Snapchat communications from 2024 have added another layer of controversy to the case.
Supporters of the accused fraternity members have cited messages attributed to Doe, including references to “our body, our choice” and discussions about drug use, to argue that the encounter was consensual.
Kelly also pointed to the messages while explaining why she believes Doe should be included in the label used to describe the case.
However, Doe’s legal team maintains that the communications are being taken out of context and do not establish that she consented to the alleged assault.
According to her attorneys, Doe was heavily traumatized and struggling with self-blame while trying to piece together what happened that night, including what occurred while she was allegedly under the influence of ketamine.
Doe’s attorney, Thomas Giuffra, has also said his client has been subjected to intense online harassment, including doxxing, death threats, and a swatting incident.
Auto Amazon Links: No products found.