Have you ever heard a mysterious sound that left you scratching your head, wondering if you just stumbled upon an underwater alien convention? Well, back in 1997, something truly bizarre echoed through the depths of the Pacific Ocean—a chilling noise known as the “bloop.” This phenomenon ignited imaginations far and wide, giving rise to theories that ranged from gigantic sea monsters to secret military experiments. But fear not! After years of suspense and speculation, scientists have finally unraveled the mystery behind this enigmatic aquatic sound. So buckle up as we dive into a strange tale that perfectly sums up how curiosity and fear can create timeless myths in the realm of the unexplained. LEARN MORE
From time to time, there are unexplained phenomena that capture the public’s curiosity. Whether it’s a UFO, mysterious tracks in the woods, or an unexplained sound at night, it seldom takes long for fear and curiosity to intermingle.
And when that happens, the public’s imagination runs away with them, and colorful theories abound. That was precisely what happened after a strange “bloop” appeared in the Pacific Ocean in 1997. But after years of speculation and wondering, scientists finally figured out what it was.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), researchers had set up underwater microphones called hydrophones throughout the southern Pacific Ocean.
The Antarctic hydrophones allowed them to listen for underwater volcanic activity.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
But as Wired reported, one day in 1997 saw those hydrophones pick up an extremely loud, ultra-low frequency sound.
ADVERTISEMENT
This tone was loud enough that hydrophones placed over 3,000 miles apart were able to pick it up.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Researchers logged multiple instances of this loud sound, but its unique characteristics made it hard to describe as anything but the “bloop.”
ADVERTISEMENT
And for almost a decade, it confounded the world as nothing like it had been recorded before then.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Although members of the NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL) were fascinated by the sound and eager to learn its origin, this was no easy task.
ADVERTISEMENT
That’s because over 95% of the depths of the world’s oceans have yet to be explored by humans. Finding what made the “bloop” was akin to searching for a very loud needle in the world’s biggest haystack.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Wired, a wide array of colorful theories gained popularity as the public gradually caught wind of the “bloop” in the years that followed the discovery.
ADVERTISEMENT
And as media reports described the sound as “organic” in nature, those theories only escalated.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Given this “organic” framing of the noise, perhaps the most popular theory among the public was that some massive sea creature had caused the “bloop.”
ADVERTISEMENT
After all, it’s not unheard of for new species to be discovered even decades after this sound was first detected.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
According to the NOAA, one of the possibilities people entertained at the time was that the bloop had come from a giant squid.
ADVERTISEMENT
But for that to be true, it would have to be a squid of unprecedented size that would look like it came from 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Other theories held a massive whale responsible for the sound. And since the world is home to some truly gargantuan whale species (like the blue whale pictured here), the idea that one was behind the “bloop” didn’t seem completely implausible.
ADVERTISEMENT
Still, either a blue whale would have to make a noise that scientists had never observed before, or an even larger, undiscovered whale species would need to exist.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Those unsatisfied with these explanations who nonetheless believed the “bloop” originated from a life form ended up getting creative with their explanations.
ADVERTISEMENT
For some, the noise was caused by what the NOAA described as “some sea creature unknown to science.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
As Wired reported, some horror fans were excited to point out that the point of origin for the “bloop” was just over 1,000 miles from where author H.P. Lovecraft envisioned the sunken city of R’yleh.
ADVERTISEMENT
For those unaware, that city was where the infamous mythical creature Cthulu was supposed to be held. And while most of these horror aficionados weren’t seriously suggesting an escaped Cthulu was causing havoc near the South Pole, it was an attractive thought.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
While theories that attributed the sound to mysterious sea life were certainly popular, others didn’t feel that a plausible explanation for the “bloop” required the invention of a new species.
ADVERTISEMENT
For them, it was more likely that researchers uncovered the sonic side effects of a secret underwater experiment by one of the world’s many military forces.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
According to the NOAA, some explanations put far more common vessels as the source of the “bloop.” For some individuals, ship engines or even the winches on fishing boats could have made the sound.
ADVERTISEMENT
But considering how far-reaching and loud the sound was, such explanations severely overestimated how noisy either of those devices is capable of being.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
When Wired spoke to NOAA seismologist Robert Dziak, he made it clear that nobody tasked with uncovering the mystery behind the “bloop” seriously thought a giant animal was responsible.
ADVERTISEMENT
He also explained what led the public to believe otherwise.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
As Dziak told Wired, “What has led to a lot of the misperception of the animal origin sound of the Bloop is how the sound is played back.”
ADVERTISEMENT
By that, he meant that the noise commonly heard by the public was about 16 times the normal speed of the “bloop’s” original audio file, which made it sound like an animal cry.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Dziak further explained that when the sound was slowed down to its normal speed, it sounded more like an earthquake or a rolling thunderstorm.
ADVERTISEMENT
That meant that for NOAA scientists, the most likely explanation was that a sustained natural process was causing the “bloop.” They just had to figure out what it was.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
What made the “bloop” so exciting to researchers was the fact that it’s actually quite rare for the NOAA’s hydrophones to pick up a sound they didn’t recognize.
ADVERTISEMENT
As Dziak explained to Wired, almost every sound that comes in fits into one of five major categories: Geophysical, anthropogenic, ice, weather, and animals.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The weather, ice, and animal categories are self-explanatory. But the geophysical category refers to events like underwater volcanic eruptions or earthquakes, while the anthropogenic category has to do with sounds made by ships and other human creations.
ADVERTISEMENT
In Dziak’s words, “Anything else is usually just some kind of electronic interference with the signal.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
But since it was unclear which category the “bloop” fit into (if any), PMEL researchers set up more hydrophones in the region it was first detected.
ADVERTISEMENT
According to the NOAA, those devices weren’t intended to find the source of the sound so much as to study the sounds of underwater volcanos and earthquakes.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
But the closer those hydrophones were placed to Antarctica, the closer researchers came to discovering the true answer to the “bloop.”
ADVERTISEMENT
And in 2005, the biggest clue to that answer finally came.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
As Dziak told Wired, researchers were particularly interested in the data they recorded from the Bransfield Strait and the Drake Passage.
ADVERTISEMENT
Both of these water bodies are near Antarctica’s northwesternmost peninsula, and their sounds were subject to what Dziak called an “acoustic survey.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The NOAA’s acoustic survey went from 2005 to 2010, and by the time it was concluded, researchers were confident they had heard the same sounds that confounded the world in 1997.
ADVERTISEMENT
Dziak described the audio they gathered as nearly identical to the “bloop” in terms of how frequent the sounds were and how long they persisted each time they were heard.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Unlike when the “bloop” was first discovered, the increased use of monitoring equipment in the area made it significantly easier to determine what was making these distinct noises.
ADVERTISEMENT
And so, the NOAA discovered that the researchers in 1997 were listening to an icequake.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
According to the NOAA, this term refers to the sounds and vibrations resulting from an iceberg breaking off a glacier.
ADVERTISEMENT
Since that was occurring during the organization’s acoustic survey, it stood to reason that something similar happened when hydrophones first picked up the “bloop.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
While it was likely satisfying to uncover the source of the “bloop” at long last, that wasn’t all that this acoustic analysis uncovered.
ADVERTISEMENT
In Dziak’s words, “It became clear that the sounds of ice breaking up and cracking is a dominant source of natural sound in the southern ocean.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Despite how long it took to determine what an icequake sounds like, it’s actually a pretty common occurrence in the world’s polar regions.
ADVERTISEMENT
As Dziak said, “Each year there are tens of thousands of what we call ‘icequakes’ created by the cracking and melting of sea ice and ice calving off glaciers into the ocean, and these signals are very similar in character to the Bloop.”
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
According to the NOAA, these icequakes have become more frequent in recent decades as the global effects of climate change become more apparent.
ADVERTISEMENT
As glaciers experience more ice melting, icebergs are more likely to break off from them and eventually melt into the ocean.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Although NOAA scientists never considered the undiscovered beast or secret military experiment theories plausible, this discovery made them even more unlikely.
ADVERTISEMENT
Considering how well the icequake sounds matched the “bloop,” there was only a remote possibility that it could have come from any other source.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
One revelation that Dziak shared with Wired was that while the PMEL team who uncovered the “bloop’s” origin were eager to do so, the eventual answer didn’t exactly shock them.
ADVERTISEMENT
Indeed, the best guess at the NOAA for years before that confirmation came was that naturally breaking ice was responsible for the noise.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Although it may have been disappointing for some to learn that the truth was a little less fantastical than their theories, there’s always some real satisfaction in solving a mystery.
ADVERTISEMENT
And barring an unexpected development in the future, this is one mystery that can be considered solved.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Although it doesn’t sound like they have many decade-spanning mysteries to solve, PMEL’s Acoustics Program continues developing technologies to better capture and analyze long-term data sets indicating sonic changes in the ocean.
ADVERTISEMENT
If the story of the “bloop” makes anything clear, it’s that those sounds can be surprisingly eloquent regarding how both humanity and natural processes can affect marine environments.