Back to Top

“Shocking Allegations: Did P Diddy Demand a Twisted Test of Loyalty from His Former Assistant?”

Added on February 1, 2025 inCelebrity News Cards

In an unfolding saga that’s more dramatic than a Hollywood blockbuster, the hip-hop mogul P Diddy finds himself in the crosshairs of a revealing new documentary. As if the headlines weren’t enough, this explosive Investigation Discovery docuseries, aptly named The Fall of Diddy, introduces a slew of outrageous claims from former colleagues and employees, including Phil Pines, his ex-senior executive assistant. With the rapper currently facing federal charges related to sex trafficking and racketeering, the testimonies shared in this four-part series are anything but ordinary. But here’s the big question: what happens when loyalty turns dark, and your boss expects more than just hard work? Pines’s revelations, particularly his assertion that he was coerced into proving his loyalty in a deeply unsettling manner, raise eyebrows and questions alike. Diddy, however, is standing firm, asserting his innocence even as the allegations mount. Buckle up—this is a whirlwind of scandal that’s just getting started! LEARN MORE.

A bombshell documentary has added to the list of accusations against P Diddy.

The rapper is currently awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking and racketeering charges, and his former senior executive assistant, Phil Pines, has shared shocking claims in a new Investigation Discovery docuseries, The Fall of Diddy.

The four-part series contains allegations from Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ former colleagues, employees and friends.

Airing earlier this week, Pines said in an episode: “The reason I wanted to tell my story was to make sure that Sean Combs and people like him can’t do these kinds of things to anybody else.”

He went on to claim his boss ordered him to have sex with a girl to prove his ‘loyalty’.

Combs’ legal team have denied the accusations included in The Fall of Diddy and he has pleaded not guilty.

Pines recalled the alleged incident. (Investigation Discovery)

Pines recalled the alleged incident. (Investigation Discovery)

Pines worked for the hip-hop mogul from 2019 to 2021 and explained in the documentary that it was hard to talk about the situations ‘because he was somebody that I looked up to’.

According to Investigation Discovery, the former assistant’s interview was only filmed last week.

He alleged that his boss pressured him to have sex with a female participant at one of the ‘Wild King Nights’ after he’d had a drink.

“I remember hearing the words: ‘Prove your loyalty to me’,” Pines claimed.

“He grabbed me by the shoulders, kind of gave me, like, a quick massage—like a coach would give a player that’s about to enter the game—and handed me a condom, pushed me to a girl that was on the couch, a guest.”

He added that the woman had given her consent and he agreed partly to avoid potential retribution from Diddy. Pines said he ‘performed for a little bit’ and then ran from the room when he could no longer see his boss.

Diddy has denied all allegations. (MEGA/GC Images)

Diddy has denied all allegations. (MEGA/GC Images)

Afterwards, he said he ‘had a great sense of remorse’ but didn’t tell anybody else about this alleged incident.

“I wanted to tell somebody, but there was so much at stake,” Pines added. “I knew if I had said anything that a kind of bomb would just explode. I hid that from everybody, including my significant other, my family, other employees.”

In a statement to LADbible, Combs’ team said: “No matter how many lawsuits are filed, it won’t change the fact that Mr. Combs has never sexually assaulted or sex trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor.

“We live in a world where anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason. Fortunately, a fair and impartial judicial process exists to find the truth, and Mr. Combs is confident he will prevail in court.”

In a statement to other outlets, his team added: “These documentaries are rushing to cash in on the media circus surrounding Mr. Combs.

“The producers failed to provide sufficient time or details for his representatives to address unsubstantiated claims, many from unidentified participants whose allegations lack context.

“By withholding this information, they made it impossible for Mr. Combs to present facts to counter these fabricated accusations. This production is clearly intended to present a one-sided and prejudicial narrative.

“As we’ve said before, Mr. Combs cannot respond to every publicity stunt or facially ridiculous claim. He has full confidence in the facts and the judicial process, where the truth will prevail: The accusations against him are pure fiction.”

RSS
Follow by Email