Ever wonder how much a role in a blockbuster film could really be worth—not just in dollars, but in destiny? As Mercury dances retrograde today, making us all second-guess the big “what-ifs,” it’s a perfect time to dive into the tale of Russell Crowe, who turned down nearly $100 million to star in one of cinema’s most legendary sagas—Lord of the Rings. While many stars have waved off life-altering roles—think Will Smith dodging The Matrix, or Michelle Pfeiffer sidestepping Silence of the Lambs—Crowe’s choice stands out like a red star in the night sky. He sensed the director had another plan, and maybe the universe was nudging him to follow a different path. But can you imagine how the film would’ve shifted with Crowe as Aragorn? Sometimes the cosmos—and casting directors—have a plan that’s not quite written in the stars for everyone. Intrigued by this celestial crossroads of career and choice? LEARN MORE
There have been a number of celebrities over the years to reveal that they turned down huge roles in films that would have completely changed their career.
No matter how big the payday they may have turned down however, few will come close to Russell Crowe, who revealed he turned down just under $100,000,000 to star in one of the biggest films roles ever.
Various film stars have turned down life-changing roles over the years, whether it be Will Smith rejecting the lead role in The Matrix or Michelle Pfeiffer turning down the chance to star in Silence of the Lambs.
Crowe’s, however, would arguably have been an even more iconic role than any of these, as he revealed he was offered the chance to star in Lord of the Rings.
Speaking on The Howard Stern Show, Crowe was asked about the fact he turned down the role, for which he was offered the massive sum of money.
Russell Crowe opened up about why he turned down the role (The Howard Stern Show / Sirius XM)
This massive sum was because he was offered 10% of whatever the film made in addition to the flat fee he would’ve been paid to star, which would’ve added up to roughly $100 million when all was said and done.
Whilst unclear if this deal would’ve carried over to all three films, if it had Crowe would’ve come out $300,000,000 richer for starring in one of the most iconic trilogies of all time.
Speaking about the opportunity, Crowe pointed to the fact that he felt Peter Jackson didn’t want him to appear in the film, with the New Zealand actor having been offered the role of Aragorn.
Crowe said: “I didn’t think Peter Jackson [director of the film] actually wanted me on the film. I think he was forced into talking to me because there was a moment in time when everybody wanted me in everything.
“He’s a fellow New Zealander, so I can hear his voice. I’m talking to him on the phone and I’m like ‘I don’t even think he knows what I’ve done’.”
The Gladiator star went on to finally add: “I just knew that my instinct was he had someone else in mind, which turned out to be Viggo [Mortensen].
“[Peter Jackson] should be allowed to hire that he wants.”
When asked about the money he would’ve potentially got for the film by Stern, he says he has ‘never thought about it’ outside of interviews where ‘people are polite and kind enough to add sh*t up for me’.
Crowe would go on to elaborate on turning down Lord of the Rings in an interview with British GQ, saying: “We come from the same place… there’s a nuance in that conversation that other people might not hear — we’re both New Zealanders — in his own way without him saying anything negative, that he had another plan.
Russell Crowe correctly thought Jackson had someone else in mind (New Line Cinema)
“So I just left it at that.”
In the same interview with Howard Stern the actor is asked about turning down the role of Wolverine, which went to Hugh Jackman after another actor, Dougray Scott, was forced to pull out to do reshoots for Mission: Impossible 2.
Crowe is again rather humble, suggesting there is ‘no way’ he would have ‘carried it through’ in the way Jackman did due to the many sequels the role ended up entailing.
With the actor having never starred in a sequel it is perhaps best for everyone involved that he turned down both roles, with him going on to still have a legendary career.