“George R.R. Martin Reveals Unseen Challenges in ‘House of the Dragon’ That Alter His Original Vision”
Added on September 4, 2024 inFree Entertainment News
$0.00
Numerology Meets Netflix: Get Your Daily Dose of Cosmic Cinema Suggestions Powered By Our AI Astrologer. Find The Show Or Movie You Were Meant To See!
Then Join Our FREE Newsletter To Watch Your Choice Of Movies And Shows For FREE Plus Get The Latest Entertainment News And Updates!
Oh, George R.R. Martin… you really know how to stir the dragon’s pot, don’t you? Just when we thought the drama was confined to the onscreen battles of Westeros, here comes the creator himself, fanning the flames behind the scenes of *House of the Dragon*. But hey, when you’re the mastermind behind some of the most beloved (and loathed) characters in fantasy history, a bit of contention about the show’s direction is almost expected, right?
Late last month, in a fiery blog post that could give *Drogon* a run for his money, Martin promised his fans he’d spill all the juicy details about what’s been going wrong (according to him) with HBO’s latest delve into his *Game of Thrones* universe. Based on his own novel *Fire and Blood*, *House of the Dragon* has apparently taken a few liberties that Martin wasn’t entirely on board with. One of the major gripes? The depiction—or rather the reduction—of Aegon and Helaena’s brood. From three children down to two, a change that might seem trivial to us mere mortals but in the mind of Martin? It’s the butterfly effect-induced chaos.
And let’s be real, messing with the original material from the man who gave us the Red Wedding? That’s a dangerous game to play. According to a now-deleted post, Martin felt that shrinking the number of kids down for budget and practical reasons robbed the story of some serious emotional weight. Particularly during a gut-wrenching “Sophie’s Choice” sequence that should’ve involved all three children, not just two. Talk about a missed opportunity for heartbreak…
But Martin, ever the pragmatist, admitted he didn’t put up much of a fight. With an already tight budget and the practical challenges of working with a two-year-old on set—let’s just say, we’ve all seen those toddler meltdowns—he reluctantly agreed. However, the twist of the dagger is that, somewhere along the way, that third child, Maelor, was axed entirely! That’s right, no season 3 introductions or future plot developments—poof, gone!
So, does this decision unravel the narrative thread? Is the butterfly flapping its wings already? Martin seems to think so, and a good chunk of the fans are on his side too. Will the show survive this narrative shortcut or will we miss the depth that extra child could have brought? Stay tuned… or better yet, read on.
**[LEARN MORE](https://www.joblo.com/george-r-r-martin-changes-house-of-the-dragon/)**
It’s not unusual for changes to be made to the source material when adapting it to a different medium. It happens all the time with books as they make the leap onto movie or television screens. However, late last month, Game of Thrones creator George R.R. Martin vowed to detail the behind-the-scenes problems on the new HBO series House of the Dragon. In a new blog post on his official website, Martin said he’d reveal “everything that’s gone wrong” with House of the Dragon, the latest live-action series set in the Game of Thrones universe. Martin co-created the show and is an executive producer, with the series based on his novel Fire and Blood.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Martin explained (in a post that has since been deleted) that he was strongly opposed to changing Aegon and Helaena’s three children to just two for the show. Changes like that are common and seemingly don’t have an impact on the story. However, Martin professes that it causes a “butterfly effect” of consequences. In the “Blood and Chase” sequence in the season two premiere, Helaena is forced into a “Sophie’s Choice” moment between her two children, but in the book, it’s between all three children.
Martin writes in his blog, “I still believe the scene in the book is stronger. The readers have the right of that. The two killers are crueler in the book. I thought the actors who played the killers on the show were excellent… but the characters are crueler, harder, and more frightening in FIRE & BLOOD. … I would also suggest that Helaena shows more courage, more strength in the book, by offering her own own life to save her son. Offering a piece of jewelry is just not the same … As I saw it, the ‘Sophie’s Choice’ aspect was the strongest part of the sequence, the darkest, the most visceral. I hated to lose that. And judging from the comments on line, most of the fans seemed to agree.”
He also explained, “I argued against it, for all these reasons. I did not argue long, or with much heat, however. The change weakened the sequence, I felt, but only a bit. And Ryan had what seemed to be practical reasons for it; they did not want to deal with casting another child, especially a two-year old toddler. Kids that young will inevitably slow down production, and there would be budget implications. Budget was already an issue on HOUSE OF THE DRAGON, it made sense to save money wherever we could. Moreover, Ryan assured me that we were not losing Prince Maelor, simply postponing him. Queen Helaena could still give birth to him in season three, presumably after getting with child late in season two. That made sense to me, so I withdrew my objections and acquiesced to the change.”
Martin, then, added, “Sometime between the initial decision to remove Maelor, a big change was made. The prince’s birth was no longer just going to be pushed back to season 3. He was never going to be born at all. The younger son of Aegon and Helaena would never appear.”
The post George R.R. Martin explains changes made to his source material for House of the Dragon that he says causes problems in the narrative appeared first on JoBlo.
){kind=link}