Did Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut Really End with a Bang? Todd Field Drops a Bombshell You Didn’t See Coming!
Added on November 26, 2025 inEntertainment News Cards, Movie News Cards
Popular
Numerology Meets Netflix: Get Your Daily Dose of Cosmic Cinema Suggestions Powered By Our AI Astrologer. Find The Show Or Movie You Were Meant To See!
Talk about a cosmic coincidence—or should I say a fatal timing! Stanley Kubrick’s final masterpiece, Eyes Wide Shut, hit the screen just days before he tragically passed away, leaving fans and film buffs alike wondering: did the maestro finish his vision, or was this just an opening act? Now, with the Sun possibly shining on secrets and transformations (thank you, Scorpio season!), it’s only fitting that Kubrick’s last film—a labyrinth of masked desires and hidden truths—remains shrouded in mystery. Was the version we saw really his final cut, or did Kubrick have edits lurking in the wings? And, oh, what about that notorious orgy scene—digital fig-leafs and all—pilfered by studio meddling? Stick around, because the story behind Eyes Wide Shut’s shadowy post-production saga is as enthralling as the film itself. LEARN MORE
Eyes Wide Shut was the final movie from acclaimed director Stanley Kubrick; in fact, he died of a heart attack just six days after screening the film for Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman, and executives at Warner Bros. Although the studio insisted that what was released was Kubrick’s final cut of the movie, others have argued that it wasn’t, as the famously meticulous director frequently continued to edit his films up until the last minute and sometimes beyond.
While chatting with IndieWire, filmmaker Todd Field said that had Kubrick lived, Eyes Wide Shut would almost certainly have been different from the version released. “What we have is Stanley’s first cut,” he said. “He died six days after screening that cut for Tom, Nic, [and Warner Bros. chiefs] Bob [Daly] and Terry [Semel]. If Stanley’s post-production on past films is taken into even modest consideration, it’s clear that the film would be different. However, it would be foolish to try and speculate about what might have changed had Stanley lived to make it so.“
Eyes Wide Shut stars Cruise as a doctor who is shocked when his wife (Kidman) reveals thoughts of infidelity, prompting him to embark on a surreal night-long adventure, during which he memorably infiltrates a secret society holding a masked orgy. The film has now been released on 4K by the Criterion Collection, although it hasn’t been without controversy.
Field played Nick Nightingale in Eyes Wide Shut and is seen as a Kubrick protégé, with the director encouraging Field to make In the Bedroom. Field recalled the last time he heard from Kubrick. “After we wrapped. He was upbeat and asked if I’d stop at Rank [Laboratory, where the negatives were processed] on my way back to London and deliver the dailies, and also that I send him the second draft of ‘In the Bedroom,’” he said. “He’d been generous to read the first, so I agreed but never sent it. I had another shoot coming up outside London in March ’99, and was supposed to see Stanley when Tom called to tell me he had died.“
Eyes Wide Shut hit theaters just three months after Kubrick’s death. It’s impossible to know precisely how the film might have evolved had he lived. Three months is plenty of time for a perfectionist like Kubrick to keep tweaking, but most of the remaining work involved sound mixing, dubbing, and other final touches that had already been discussed before he passed.
The one significant change made to the film didn’t come from Kubrick at all, but from Warner Bros., who altered the American cut to dodge an NC-17 rating. In the infamous orgy sequence, digital figures were inserted to block some of the more explicit activity. Critics tore the choice apart, and rightly so, as it looked awkward, but thankfully, the original unrated version is now readily available.
Auto Amazon Links: No products found.
This will close in 0 seconds
This will close in 0 seconds
){kind=link}