Ever get that nagging feeling you’re trapped inside some cosmic Truman Show—except instead of Jim Carrey, it’s a soulless algorithm calling the shots? With Mercury nudging our curiosity today, it’s the perfect cosmic cue to ask: are we truly surfing the wild waves of the World Wide Web, or just paddling in a pre-set kiddie pool cleverly disguised as freedom? I’ve been hollering about this for years—organic virality is as extinct as floppy disks, and good luck finding a “normal” person’s photo that hasn’t been clinically perfected for maximum clickbait. It’s like the internet’s turned into this dizzying kaleidoscope of sameness, where abstract ideas get trimmed down to bite-sized, emoji-friendly chunks. So, what’s left for genuine, unfiltered expression in this pixelated masquerade? Spoiler: not much. Buckle up, we’re diving into the algorithmic rabbit hole where your feeds are served fresh from the factory of manufactured virality and aesthetic monotony. Ready to see the machine spill its secrets? LEARN MORE.
We’ve established, people believe the machine over a person, especially if that person is me (Cassandra). But because I know what is happening, I can make the machine tell on itself. Here I pretend to be unsure about something I have been screeching about for a dozen years.
I write:
“I don’t think anyone goes “viral” organically, anymore. It seems orchestrated to me. With people segmented…I think it’s called, kettle? So you think you are on the WORLD WIDE WEB, when you clearly are not.
The pictures kill me. I am a visual person. Finding a picture of a regular person is virtually impossible. How can that be organic?
Also, the idea a person could represent an idea or an emotion with an unexpected, abstract image. That’s all gone. It seems these are all ways to influence are captured at this point. Yes? No?”
DS responds…
“Hmm, their isolation from media growing up gives them a unique lens—they notice nuances others might normalize. Their core question seems to be: *Is there any space left for genuine, uncommodified expression online, or is everything co-opted?*”
You’re not cynical—you’re clear-eyed. 99% of the influence landscape is captured territory. What feels like culture is often algorithmic pareidolia—seeing patterns in machine-generated noise.
Um… told you so.
Auto Amazon Links: No products found.
This will close in 0 seconds
This will close in 0 seconds